Everything about Sacred-profane Dichotomy totally explained
The
dichotomy between the sacred and the profane has been identified by
French sociologist Émile Durkheim as the central characteristic of
religion: "religion is a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to
sacred things, that's to say, things set apart and forbidden." In Durkheim's theory, the sacred represented the interests of the group, especially unity, which were embodied in sacred group symbols,
totems. The profane, on the other hand, involved mundane individual concerns. Durkheim explicitly stated that the dichotomy sacred/profane wasn't equivalent to good/evil: the sacred could be good or evil, and the profane could be either as well.
Criticism
Durkheim's claim of the universality of this dichotomy for all religions/
cults has been criticized by scholars like British
anthropologist Jack Goody. Goody also noted that "many societies have no words that translate as sacred or profane and that ultimately, just like the distinction between natural and supernatural, it was very much a product of
European religious thought rather than a universally applicable criterion."
Some Eastern religions like Buddhism disapprove of cultivating dualism, even between the sacred and the profane. A disciple is first asked to cultivate "a good mind". In the intermediate stage, the disciple is asked to "break through the good mind" (i.e, stop distinguishing between the sacred and the profane). In the final stage of learning, the monk lets go of all conceptualizations of good and bad or sacred and profane. This is called the final good.
The
Puritans challenged the dichotomy's prevalence within medieval/early modern
Christianity, especially
Catholicism, especially regarding a person's occupation.
William Tyndale wrote that, superficially, there's "difference betwixt washing of dishes and preaching of the word of God; but as touching to please God; none at all";
wrote that the "action of a shepherd in keeping sheep is as good a work before God as is the action of a judge in giving sentence, or a magistrate in ruling, or a minister in preaching."
resolved the dichotomy by holding that a person's attitude could in a sense make sacred work which was normally looked down on - "Faith...encourageth a man in his calling to the homeliest and difficultest...Such homely employments a carnal heart knows not how to submit unto; but now faith having put us into a calling, if it require some homely employment, it encourageth us in it...So faith is ready to embrace any homely service his calling leads him to, which a carnal heart would blush to be seen in."
[Further Information]
Get more info on 'Sacred-profane Dichotomy'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://sacred-profane_dichotomy.totallyexplained.com">Sacred-profane dichotomy Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
